「教」幼兒玩劇場遊戲: 與實習教師之協同探究 "Teaching" Children to Play Theatre Games: A Collaborative Inquiry with a Student Teacher
Abstract
在香港,遊戲愈來愈受到幼兒教育工作者的重視。不過,人們一 直以為遊戲不必教授,又或用來滿足學術的目的,加上社會文 化與客觀條件的限制等種種問題,都令遊戲推行遇上阻礙。作者 認為教育改革須從教師改善自身教學,反思和探究課堂教學實踐 開始。本文報告一位實習教師(作者二)與其指導教師(作者 一),就跟幼兒玩劇場遊戲的教學策略,協作進行的反思探究。 兩位作者借用了幼兒動作教學的理論來解決劇場遊戲帶來的課堂 秩序問題,經反思及實踐後,提出分解遊戲規則和運用有序的課 堂語言兩個策略為解難方法。這次協同探究能讓作者二在設計、 講解和帶領幼兒玩劇場遊戲的技巧,以至相關教學理論方面都有 所增長。至於作者一則更明白生手及前線教師使用劇場遊戲的困 難,有助檢討師訓內容與方法。
關鍵詞:幼兒遊戲、動作教學、遊戲規則、劇場遊戲、課堂 語言
In Hong Kong, early childhood educators have progressively emphasized the importance of play. However, it happens that play has long been seen not to be taught explicitly, or other it just to be taught to fulfill academic goals. Moreover, the promotion of play is also further hindered by socio-cultural factors and other general constraints in town. The authors, the teaching practicum supervisor (A1) and her student teacher (A2), believe that education reform should begin with teachers’ self-improvement, reflection and exploration of their classroom teaching practice. This paper has reported their collaborative inquiry on teaching strategies for children to play theatre games. The authors have borrowed the theories of movement instruction to tackle the children’s discipline problems arisen in the theatre games classroom. After reviewing and practicing the revised strategies, the authors, in turn, offer solutions to improve theatre game instruction in a new light by two strategies, namely decomposition of rules of games and the use of structured classroom discourse. As regard the student teacher, this collaborative inquiry has promoted improvement in relation to designing, demonstrating and skills guiding children to play theatre games, and other relevant teaching theories. At the same time, the author (A1) has been placed at a better position to comprehend the problems faced by novice and frontline teachers when using theatre games, from which she has further examined the content and methods of her teacher training.
Keywords: Children’s play, classroom discourse, movement instruction, rules of play, theatre game
Full Text:
PDF (繁體中文)References
方永泉(2003)。從「遊戲」意義的轉拆來反思當代遊戲文化的特徵及其引發的教育思考。 教育研究集刊,49(3),63-92。
課程發展委員會(1984)。幼稚園課程指引。香港:課程發展委員會。
課程發展議會(2006)。學前教育課程指引。香港:課程發展議會。
李俊亮與黃婉萍(2011)。劇場的用家。香港:國際演藝評論家協會(香港分會)有限公司。
林玫君(2005)。創造性戲劇理論與實務:教室中的行動研究。臺北市:心理出版社。
孫峰(2001)。狐狸孵蛋。臺北市:格林文化事業股份有限公司。
許卓婭(2006)。學與教的心理探秘──幼稚園集體音樂舞蹈教學指南。南京:南京師範大學出版社。
陳敬旻(譯)(2009)。開放的門。(原作者:P. Brook)。臺北市:書林出版有限公司。 陳仁富和黃國倫(譯)(2010)。透視戲劇──戲劇教學實作指南。(原作者:J. Neelands)。臺北市:心理出版社。
郭靜晃(譯)(1992)。兒童遊戲:遊戲發展的理論與實務。(原作者:J. E. Johnson, J. F. Christie & T. D. Yawkey)。臺北市:揚智文化。
林翠湄(譯)(2000)。動作教學:幼兒重要的動作經驗。(原作者:P. S. Weikart)。臺北市:心理出版社。
林玫君(譯)(1994)。創作性兒童戲劇入門(原作者:B. T. Salisbury)。臺北市:心理出版社。
區曼玲(譯)(1998)。劇場遊戲指導手冊。(原作者:V.Spolin)。臺北市:書林出版有限公司。
Barker, C. (2010).Theatre games: A New approach to drama training. London: Methuen Drama.
Boal, A. (2002). Games for actors and non-actors (Jackson A. Trans.). New York: Routledge.
Bolton, G. (1992). New perspectives on classroom drama. Hertfordshine: Simon & Schuster
Education.
Cheng, P. W. D. (2001). Difficulties of Hong Kong teachers’ understanding and
implementation of ‘play’ in the curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 857-869.

Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49.
Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002).Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 73-85.
Dewey, J. (1993). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
Mouritsen, F. (2002).Child culture-play culture. In F. Mouritsen & J. Qvortrup (Eds.), Childhood and children’s culture (pp.14-42). Odense, Denmark: University Press of Southern Demark.
Gomez, M. L. (1990). Reflections on research for teaching: Collaborative inquiry with a novice teacher. Journal of Education for Teaching,16, 45-56.
Karpov, Y.V. (2005). The Neo-Vygotskian approach to child development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Li, Y. L. (2004). Pupil-teacher interactions in Hong Kong kindergarten classrooms – Its implications for teachers’ professional development. Learning Environments Research, 7(1), 36-45.
Löfdahl, A. L. (2005). Preschool teachers’ conception of children’s ‘chaotic play’. In F. F. McMahon, D. E. Lytle & B. Sutton-Smith (Eds.), Play: An interdisciplinary synthesis (pp. 195-208). Lanhan, Md.: University Press of America.
Loughran, J.J. (2010).Reflection through collaborative action research and inquiry. In N. Lyons (Eds.), Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry: Mapping a way of knowing for professional reflective inquiry (pp.399-413). New York: Springer.
Nelson, T., & Slavit, D. (2008).Supported teacher collaborative inquiry. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(1), 99-116.
Sennett, R. (1976). The fall of public man. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tam, Po-chi. (2012).Children's bricolage under the gaze of teachers in sociodramatic play. Childhood: A Journal of Global Child Research, 20(2), 244-259.
Wallace, M. J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Winston, J. (October, 2008). Drama education for personal, social and moral growth. Keynote
presented at the International Conference of Drama-in-Education and Applied Theatre, National Taiwan University of Arts, Taiwan.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.